Bonne question!
Il existe une regle qui dit que le "vous ne pouvez pas" prévaut toujours sur le "vous pouvez".
Citation :
101.2. When a rule or effect allows or directs something to happen, and another effect states that it can't happen, the "can't" effect takes precedence.
Example: If one effect reads "You may play an additional land this turn" and another reads "You can't play land cards this turn," the effect that precludes you from playing lands wins
l'interaction entre le "vous pouvez" et le "vous pouvez pas" dans le cas
Maralen des Chantematins vs
Danseuse d'esprit kor est réglée par la section:
Citation :
120.3. However, if an effect says that a player can't draw cards and another effect offers that player the choice to draw a card, that player can't choose to do so
l'interaction entre tes deux effets pourrait etre réglé par
Citation :
601.5. A player can't begin to cast a spell that's prohibited from being cast.
Le seul truc qui me pose probleme c'est que l'on pourait considerer que tu as ici deux effets continus qui se contredisent dans la meme couche en essayant de changer les regles du jeu, ce qui impliquerait une utilisation du tampon horaire.
Citation :
613.10. Some continuous effects affect game rules rather than objects. For example, effects may modify a player's maximum hand size, or say that a creature is indestructible. These effects are applied after all other continuous effects have been applied. Continuous effects that affect the costs of spells or abilities are applied according to the order specified in rule 601.2e. All other such effects are applied in timestamp order. See also the rules for timestamp order and dependency (rules 613.6 and 613.7
Je pense cependant que le "vous ne pouvez pas" prévaut toujours sur le "vous pouvez"
